On 15 April 2011 13:28, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Johnwhelan is the account name. Unfortunately I have made a fair number of > edits. The concern is I'm not comfortable that all of these meet the new > standard but I'm unsure which ones do and which don't. I'm happy to reenter > data following the new guidelines. I'm not happy to have some one else say > don't worry about it. >
Thanks for that. What is the answer to my second question? Where do the potentially problem contributions come from? Email me off list if you must. Regards Grant > Thanks John > > On 15 April 2011 03:55, Grant Slater <openstreet...@firefishy.com> wrote: >> >> On 15 April 2011 00:38, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>If data is "tainted" in a way that makes in incompatible with the >> >> currently >> >> used license then it will have to be removed in order not to put the >> >> project >> >> at risk (e.g. data copied from proprietary sources). This is >> >> independent of >> >> the license change. >> > >> > I assume that the currently used license means to the ODBL license now >> > in >> > use by contributors. If so how and to whom do I serve notice that even >> > though I clicked on the accept button I'm not comfortable that all my >> > edits >> > before March 2011 contain only data is that is completely untainted so >> > rather than put the OSM project at risk could they be removed. I'm >> > happy to >> > get out my GPS and notepad and ensure anything I add from today forward >> > will >> > meet the new criteria. >> > >> >> Hi John, >> >> What is your OSM account name? Where did the imported data come from: >> government source, printed map, something else? >> >> Regards >> Grant > > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk