The very first I did, I did it according to 'spec': http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7595148
The result is a ridiculous amount of 4 relations for a street of less than 1,5 km in length. Some of which only contain one house. And each of them containing redundant name, addr:city, addr:postcode and addr:country tags. Hence my disagreement with the spec. I did realise that JOSM probably had a reason to complain about it, ofc. Another problem/argument is that when streets are split, there will be 2 or more street segments in those relations anyway. Cheers, Polyglot 2011/5/3 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> > 2011/5/3 Jo <[email protected]>: > > What I do to avoid most redundancy, is to create an associatedStreet > > relation. ... I add more than one street to them though, even if JOSM > > complains about that. > > > it is not just JOSM complaining about this, it is against the "spec": > > Members > Way/node Role Recurrence Comment > Way street one The associated street > Node Area house one or more One or more house numbers (use > "house" > in tagging but in parsing also allow: "addr:houselink", address ) > > cheers, > Martin >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
