On 10 June 2011 21:38, Nic Roets <nro...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2. How do they know that there is overwhelming support from the > community ? (I don't believe the license change passed this test) and
Close to 99% of mappers who actively voted supported the change. > 3. And waiting for the community to get 100% behind a change can take > a very long time. If we want to compete with Google Map Maker, we may > need to act much faster. Here I agree with you fully. This is why the CT are hugely important to the future of the project. You have declined them. How do you propose that we, as a project, equip ourselves to react quickly in a way that does not require 100% support? > In the short term people should either become OSMF members or live > with the consequences. In the long term, we could adopt a process > where voting does not cost anything. (For example, I recently received > a couple of messages from Wikimedia saying that my small number of > edits made me eligible to vote in their election). How much did it cost you to cast your no vote? Dermot -- -------------------------------------- Igaühel on siin oma laul ja ma oma ei leiagi üles _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk