I looked at it again, and its not OSM data. It is NAVTEQ data. Its much better than when I last looked at NAVTEQ data so I was confused. :-) But on closer inspection I can see that the OSM data is still better and more current.
FF 3.6.17 on Linux, no Silverlight. Jochen On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 05:07:31PM +1000, Nick Hocking wrote: > Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:07:31 +1000 > From: Nick Hocking <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Bing Maps are amazing > > Jochen, > > I see attribution on my browser (bottom left corner). Rendering is, I think > standard mapnik, looks ok to me. > > Andrew E, did you try my link and zoom over to Korea. I think you'll find > all the OSM data there looking quite good. > > Cheers > Nick > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Jochen Topf <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 04:07:33PM +1000, Nick Hocking wrote: > > > > > http://www.bing.com/maps/explore/#5003/s=w&p=c/5872/style=Mapnik&lat=-35.206078&lon=149.103028&z=17&pid=50735 > > > > > > > > > Tose are the newly added roads. Ive been using Bing's mapnik facility for > > a > > > few months now - It's really good. > > > > That definitly looks like OSM data. But there is no attribution for OSM. > > And > > the rendering is really ugly. :-) > > > > Jochen > > -- > > Jochen Topf [email protected] http://www.remote.org/jochen/ > > +49-721-388298 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- Jochen Topf [email protected] http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
