On 22/06/2011 21:22, Mike Dupont wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Steve Coast <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:On 6/22/2011 12:51 PM, 80n wrote:On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:31 PM, SteveC <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: How will fosm (assuming it reaches the stage of being functional) continue to sync with OSM when the licenses are incompatible? 1. fosm.org <http://fosm.org> is functional, you should try it.I did. Perhaps we use different meanings for 'functional'. OSM shows you maps for example. Fosm has a link to 'maps' which 404s. did you see this? http://www.archive.org/download/SharedMap2/index.html
Odd. zoom in to the dizzy heights of 16 (in Denmark WA FWIW) and you get "picture coming soon". I picked Denmark because it's somewhere that I've been and added stuff (to OSM, but would also like to see the likes of FOSM using that same data too). Competion is good. It seems a bit of a shame that the forkers are being let down by a rather poor implementation (or so it seems) so far.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
