On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Michael Collinson <[email protected]> wrote:
> ** > If it is UK Ordnance Survey data that is the issue, we now have direct > clarification from them that they have no objection to continued > distribution of data derived from their OS OpenData under under the ODbL. At > the moment, this excludes Code-Point Open, (postcode) data. Hope that helps. > > The statement from the OS did not specify what content license was to be used for their content. They did not explicitly mention that their content could be included using the DbCL. My understanding is that the OpenData license would be the one that was applicable unless a more permissive license was *explicitly* granted by them, which it was not. Is this a correct reading of how things stand at the moment or have OS subsequently clarified that they are happy for their content to be licensed using DbCL within a database that is protected by ODbL?
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
