On 7/29/2011 10:52 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Nathan Edgars II<nerou...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'll leave it for a few days so others can see it in all its glory :)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/31408390
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/31408400
Let's be fair. Tagging name=[PAVED,UNPAVED] is suboptimal, yes.
On the other hand, these edits are a couple of years old, from a
mapper who had been mapping for about a month at the time. And who
mapped from their own survey and gps trackfiles. This mapper was
doing just about everything right, with their heart clearly in the
right place.
No - his ways are parallel to the actual paved and unpaved roads. They
were added solely to make the words render. (The road is from the 2007
TIGER import.) I'm not judging him; I just find it amusing.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
