Hi,

Kate Chapman wrote:
I'm not sure I understand why having the ability to link to external
data through some sort of ID is such a bad thing.

This is about external data linking to us, not vice versa.

This is common in
many APIs and datasets.   It is an opportunity to mix data in new ways
as well.

That's why it ought to be done right, in a way that places no additional burden on our project. (And if you need proof that it isn't easy - even Navteq and TeleAtlas do not promise stability of their IDs, and indeed they change often.)

Frederik also this seems odd to me " I'm not a big fan of UUIDs
because, again, it burdens *our* data with stuff
that other people want to do with it."  Define other people, do you
mean mappers, data users?

I mean the work of mappers becoming more complicated because people who are not mappers want their demands met.

For every mapper there are hundreds who want to use our data (and whereas the mapper never receives any money, many of our data users actually make money or save money by using our data). This means, to me, that if data users want to have it easier, want stable linking to OSM or whatever, they ought to shoulder the burden themselves rather than asking us to shoulder it for them IN ADDITION to what we are already doing.

And, as I have explained, it would be a simple matter of programming (plus a little funds to run the service) to do this properly.

Why aquiesce to use tags at all, making
data more consistent just burdens *our* data with stuff other people
want to do with it.

Like it or not, most of our mappers are in it for the map. That's why they use tags. If most of our mappers were in it for the general idea of a semantic web and a linked data store that encompasses the planet, things might look different.

I think being able to link between datasets can be beneficial.  Maybe
versioning on the API makes sense, maybe UUIDs, but I don't think the
linking is such a bad thing.

My main point was that any additional burden caused for us by linking - be that a reuirement for constant IDs, the introduction of additional tags, or warnings that pop up when someone tries to make an otherwise normal edit - is hard to accept for me, and I'd prefer a third-party service that does all this without affecting us negatively. It's technically possible so if someone is really eager to have proper linking then why not just do it.

Bye
Frederik

--
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail [email protected]  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to