straup <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not going to pretend to understand the guts of the OSM code well > enough to suggest that supersedes/superseded_by would be easy to > implement or not but it's always seemed like a useful approach to me. This supersedes / is superseded by approach would work, although there would need to be provision for a database object to supersede multiple objects (a merge operation) or be superseded by several objects (a split operation).
-- John F. Eldredge -- [email protected] "Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
