I suspect the people who do the rendering rather assume that 99%+ of the time, bicycle=yes/designated coincides with foot=yes/designated (either on that way or one so immediately adjacent that you couldn't draw them separately). So there's no distinction to be made, and blue=both.
If you want to make fancy distinctions, render it yourself (try Maperitive) Richard On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:25 PM, john whelan <[email protected]> wrote: > There are many different ways to render cycle and footpaths and a number of > different ways to indicate them as well. You can create your own custom > rendering rules but in view of all the differences floating around I suspect > the defaults work fine for most people. > > For example locally we have mutil use paths some are tagged cycle some are > not, we have paved shoulders that are used for snow in winter and cycles in > summer, they don't show on the default mapnik rendering. The latest I've > heard of is sharrow markings which are being used locally again not rendered > by default. > > Cheerio John > > On 20 August 2011 10:49, Tomas Straupis <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> Currently combined bicycle & footway >> (highway=path/foot=designated/bicycle=designated) is rendered in >> mapnik as a simple cycleway (blue dotted line). >> >> Is there a reason for this or simply nobody has fixed that in mapnik >> stylesheet (currently bicycle blue is rendered on top of footway red >> making red part invisible)? >> >> I've seen this one: >> http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2425 >> but the reasoning "blue dots are on anything you can ride a bicycle" >> is not convincing... You can ride on track, on residential and yet >> it's not blue dots... I would like such combined ways to indicate that >> they are created for BOTH cyclists and walkers (especially then this >> would include segregated ones). >> >> I could send a working mapnik0.7 fix for that... (rendering it as >> blue-red-blue-red dots.) >> >> P.S. Sorry if this is not an appropriate list for this (there is no >> such list as "osm-mapnik" or similar). >> >> -- >> Tomas Straupis >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
