On 29/08/11 16:00, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/8/29 Steve Bennett<[email protected]>:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Tom Hughes<[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. So I guess we should avoid using name=* on
anything which should not be rendered.
+1, IMHO it is also generally disputable to keep coverage-polygons of
other data providers in the OSM main database.
Yes I should have added that, in this case, my preference would be to
remove the object altogether as aerial imagery coverage areas are not
real on the ground objects that should be in our database.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([email protected])
http://compton.nu/
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
