On 27 September 2011 12:36, Richard Fairhurst <[email protected]> wrote:
> Tim Waters (chippy) wrote: > > I also think that a voluntary opt-in review system would work - and > > only really needs someone to write one, and a JOSM plugin, and a > > Potlatch 2 patch. > > I'll very happily patch P2, assuming the "please review" functionality can > be built into the core Rails site. (OSM doesn't, and P2 shouldn't, depend > on > third party-hosted services.) > > This would also fit in well with the proposed integration of OWL to give a > better idea of which changesets affect which areas. > > (Suggest follow-ups to the rails-dev@ mailing list - sorry, would > cross-post > but Nabble doesn't give that option.) > > cheers > Richard > > > How would the reviewer be selected? What about using part of the OSM system already. When you select the "I want this reviewed" button, it could add a changeset tag review_request=yes. It should then be easy to have a map of changeset bounding boxes where review_request=yes, so you can pick one near to you. I suppose you then need a way to mark that it has been reviewed, or the user has been contacted. With OAuth can you post a user diary that could contain a link to the changeset? (people already watch the diary to answer newbie questions). But maybe now I'm trying to make too much use of the existing systems. -- Gregory [email protected] http://www.livingwithdragons.com
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
