Andrew Guertin [mailto:[email protected]] wrote: > Sent: 07 October 2011 17:08 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Jerusalem name tag - Mediation > > On 10/07/2011 11:40 AM, Andy Robinson wrote: > > I'm going to suggest the latter, three nodes as follows: [...] > > Any solution should probably apply to relations as well as nodes (or instead > of nodes, if I had my way). > > See also http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/131585141 with a > creation date of 2011-09-28. > > (Was this deleted and recreated? Wikipedia appears to have a screenshot of > it, but their image is from February...) >
A good point. I was only considering nodes but I don't see any problem with defining the east and west sections as ways (I'm not sure I would go as far as saying any need for relations at present). Ways also permits some overlap of the areas where the boundary between east and west parts is fuzzy or disputed though I'd take a dim view if the two sets of local mappers created east and west areas that encompassed the whole city. Some feedback from local mappers regarding way's vs node's for the E/W parts of the city would be helpful here. Cheers Andy _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
