2011/10/26 80n <[email protected]>: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Grant Slater <[email protected]> > wrote: >> No absolute decision has been made, but seems most practical to remain >> CC-by-SA. > > Why wouldn't OSM publish their tiles under the most liberal license they are > able to?
To get credit. A license with attribution aspects seems more suitable to augment visibility of the project and in the end also increase the number of active mappers. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
