Andreas
Currently there is no agreement on what exactly the rules/policy/algorithm will be to determine which objects or tags will survive the transition and as a consequence, all visualizations, stats and other tools have their own method to determine what the status of a specific object is. So while I might support the notion that an untagged node is not more than a piece of white paper with contents that can be erased and rewritten without invoking IPR inheritance, at least some people don't agree.
I do believe I can say so much that the absence of a clear policy is recognized as an issue and at least I have pressed to get it nailed down (not in every detail) asap.
That said, I believe P2 now has a tool that will completly replace a node with a new one at the same coordinates which is a bit of a fix for your specific issue.
Simon Am 16.11.2011 07:49, schrieb Andreas Labres:
Hello, there is something wrong with the license status P2 shows... A node without tags holds only one information: its location (lat+lon). So for instance: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/246625694 was last edited by me (I put the node there), I agreed to the terms, but P2 showes this node in orange. This can't be true. /al _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
