Am 29.11.2011 12:30, schrieb Parveen Arora:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Janko Mihelić<[email protected]>  wrote:
Your question is the same as if someone asked "why isn't there an official
Linux; not Ubuntu, not Mint, not Debian, but simply official Linux
distribution".
No doubt this is a good approach, but the moment when you will ask
some one to recommend any of one among all there will be lot of
different opinions, and there are approximately 500 distros of Linux
available which I think is not required and is wastage of resources,
time and energy.
A nice one would not simply give you one specific distribution, because you want to use Linux. Instead there would be some questions: what do you want to do with it? use it as a windows replacement for office work, or for driver developement? doing graphical stuff or running a server - and so on. With regard to the answers there may be one or a few chosen distributions the asked person would give you probably, and that's completely okay.

If I ask you, which computer game to buy as a christmas present, you would ask back, who should get it, too, and don't recommend the same for a hardcore gamer as you would recommend for my 5 year old sister - and for me, that sounds reasonable.
Open source and open data don't work that way. A healthy ecosystem with lots
of apps is the goal.
Nothing is always perfect, One have to always work to things better and better.
If you think the current system is absolutely right and there is no
need of any change then it is ok.

But someone on this thread told me that OSM is a loose community so I
wondered why its like that, Can't we come as a strong community or
organisation.
OSM worldwide is a loose community, but there are some strong local communities and some individual connections between different local communities on top of that. And that's fine. It's not more complex than necessary, but it's possible to keep different opinions and styles for different groups.

Some people want to meet regularly - and do so, others want to do their own thing individually most of the time. Some people want to start mapping projects with a specific goal, others feel good by continuously contributing small stuff. Next people (but only a few) are happy by fixing bugs in their lunch break, but not doing anything else.

If you want an "official" OSM application - what should it be able to do?
viewing osm maps? that's possible with hundrets of applications - and with the osm.org website, too. editing? There are people who prefer JOSM and others who prefer potlatch. Both are highly connected and associated with osm without being "official".
routing? What kind of routing? How fast? online? offline?

If you would want to make an official app supporting everything, I promise, this is not stable for a long time, as it's very much maintenance work. If you would want to do that supporting all(tm) platforms (android, iphone, windows mobile, windows, linux, mac-os desktops, ...) it's much much more difficult, and if you would not want to support some of these platforms, but call it "official" you have to explain, why osm "officially" supports one platform, but the other one.

I don't think, anything would get better by this.

regards
Peter

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to