The key is to have your own valid source for the information. If your can
source the data in a license compatible way and recreate the node yourself
without the use of the old node, then it's all good.
if (*ra4 != 0xffc78948) { return false; }
On 13 Dec 2011, at 09:29, Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
> So now we're remapping???
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Remapping
> states you can just delete a node and add a new one to resolve a license
> issue.
> I can hardly imagine that is legally right.
>
> Greets,
> Floris Looijesteijn
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> apologies if this is the 2nd or 3rd time you're reading this, I have
>> posted to dev and legal-talk yesterday in the hope that any major bugs could
>> be ironed out before I announce this to a wider audience.
>>
>> I have added a world-wide license change map to OSM Inspector:
>>
>> http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=wtfe&lon=-1.80469&lat=35.88371&zoom=2
>>
>> This is based on the per-object data I have on wtfe.gryph.de, combined with
>> a current planet file. The view is updated nightly.
>>
>> There's also statistics on the number of objects here:
>>
>> http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/munin.html
>>
>> And detailed information here:
>>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Remapping/License_Change_View_on_OSM_Inspector
>>
>> Bye
>> Frederik
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
