Frederik Ramm writes: > In this case however, there's a sequence of about 20 nodes that was > created by the initial user and even though these may all have been > individually moved and therefore the individual nodes are considered > "clean", the fact that these 20 nodes in this sequence form a line is > considered the "work" of the original mapper.
... and the only reason I bothered to preserve that is to reduce the number of new nodes in the database. Frankly, it would have been easier just to throw away all the "work" of the nodecision user because it was complete crap. It was a really REALLY low-quality import. It looked like this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.33247&lon=-75.91907&zoom=15 > This is, of course, open to discussion. If mapper A creates a way with > 20 nodes and adds one tag, and mapper B moves all those nodes > individually *and* replaces the tag with someone else, then if A > disagrees and B agrees, do we believe that A retains a copyright? It doesn't matter what WE believe, because WE are not seeking to take over the copyright. The only thing that matters here is what the OSMF believes, which may or may not have anything to do with what the law says. We editors (who are not lawyers, and do not read legal-talk) need to know how much of our work is going to be discarded in a few months. -- --my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com Crynwr supports open source software 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815 Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
