On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Frederik Ramm <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 01/14/2012 07:10 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: >> >> 1) There's no planet files for Jan 09. > > > I can give you one. I have them archived in pbf format, two for each date - > one with all the US data and one with all the non-US data. Do you need both > halves?
I downloaded the 081231 one which seems OK (I only did a osmosis --migrate and --bp operation on it and that went through). > (I also have a working version of the 100106 planet.) I'm downloading the 100113 planet now, I'll try that first. Thanks for the offers though - I may take you up on one later. > But you should really be using the full history file - fraction of the > download size and you have it all in there! I know, they're just harder to work with for me. I have some code based on imposm.parser which does not seem to want to parse .osh.pbf files. osmjs seems the way to go for me for working with full history files (I can't code C++) but I'd have to rewrite that python code (and the accompanying unit tests). Will probably try both. I love that the history files are available and I'd much prefer using them, also because it allows for much deeper inspection into the user contribution dynamics than the snapshots. > >> 2) The planet files around that time have 'nolt' in their names. Are >> they special in some way? > > > A large copyright violation in Lithuania that we needed to revert later; > these planet files are lacking *all* of Lithuania. > Thanks for confirming that. -- martijn van exel geospatial omnivore 1109 1st ave #2 salt lake city, ut 84103 801-550-5815 http://oegeo.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
