This is awesome.

I've reposted it here, after tracking down URLs for each of the stories and 
comments you mention:
        http://mike.teczno.com/notes/nice-problem.html

-mike.

On Mar 8, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:

> * 3500 tiles per second. Seriously. In Grant's words on Twitter: "Massive 
> jump in #OpenStreetMap traffic due 2 Apple news: t.co/nB4ffgYy Fighting fires 
> 2 keep systems up"
> 
> * switch2osm.org fell over. Yep, so many people wanting to find out about 
> switching to OpenStreetMap that WordPress crapped itself (ok, not the hardest 
> target but hey ;) ).
> 
> * More contributors. We've had people come into IRC saying "I want to fix 
> this park name, how do I do it?". Regular IRCers have been reporting a 
> noticeably greater number of new editors in their areas. Or as someone just 
> asked on IRC: "hmm did the apple fanbois drink the OSM koolaid and crash our 
> servers with zealous mapping?"
> 
> * I think we've had a higher peak of publicity today than we've ever had - 
> higher than the Foursquare switch even, or the Google vandalism incident. 
> We've been Slashdotted; we're #6 on Hacker News. We've been on The Verge, 
> Forbes, Wired, Ars, Gizmodo, and all the Mac sites - that's taking OSM to 
> people who've not heard of us before. We might not be the front page of the 
> New York Times yet, but we're getting there!
> 
> * And one of the best things has been that people like how we've handled it. 
> From Forbes: "OpenStreetMap itself has been much more polite about the whole 
> thing. 'It’s really positive for us,' OSM founder Steve Coast told Talking 
> Points Memo, 'It’s great to see more people in the industry using OSM. We do 
> have concerns that there wasn’t attribution.'."
>    From a comment at Hacker News: "While I think it's quite messed up that a 
> company as rich as Apple can't abide putting credits for people who have put 
> some really good work in (I've even made small updates to OSM in my time) I 
> do think that this is a very classy move by the OSM people, no ranting blog 
> post or 'Apple stole our stuff', welcoming people presents a much better 
> image of the project."
>    Or The Verge: "Granted, OSM took this as an opportunity to get in the 
> public eye by piggybacking on the iPad’s media fanfare; I applaud them for 
> their maturity in their statement though. Many companies would’ve latched 
> onto this and unleashed the lawyers threatening this and that, but they chose 
> to be civil, point out the missing attributions, and say they are ‘we look 
> forward to working with Apple to get that on there.’ A little civility goes a 
> long way (in my book). I’m quite sick of the mudslinging in this space."
> 
> Thanks to everyone who's put the hours in today, to all the coders and 
> sysadmins who sweat blood to not only keep OSM running but make it easier and 
> faster... and to every single mapper making a map so amazing that everyone 
> _wants_ to use it.
> 
> cheers
> Richard
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> 

----------------------------------------------------------------
michal migurski- [email protected]
                 415.558.1610




_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to