Am 27.04.2012 03:28, SomeoneElse:
I noticed this while looking at the map here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=32.001059&lon=34.825519&zoom=18&layers=M
The "Hires coverage of Bing imagery in the Near East" label is from the
name on this relation:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1298962
Regardless of the "perhaps the map shouldn't render unknown things just
because of name=blah" issue, I'd argue that metadata such as this really
doesn't belong in OSM. I've messaged the three previous editors of this
relation and two haven't objected to it's removal (the other one hasn't
replied). Can anyone put forward a good reason why it should be kept?
I can't see a good reason given there is a website such as
http://ant.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/
that shows you Bing worldwide highres coverage.
Claudius
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
