On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:03 PM, David Groom <[email protected]> wrote: > Should the licence change to something other than CC-BY-SA 2.0 or ODbL 1.0, > OSMF have guaranteed that they will identify and remove any data > incompatible with that licence. > > Incidentally, I believe that the burden OSMF have imposed upon themselves > makes it almost certain that no other licence than CC-BY-SA 2.0 or ODbL 1.0 > would ever be used.
Ok, well then if this is so, then we dont need to leave the license question open as in the CT. Why all the drama then? If I can resolve this question, then it should not be a problem for me to convince people to add the odbl clause to people providing data. I cannot ask people to agree to an open license, that is out of the question, but odbl for database rights does not seem to be a problem. It occurs me then under certain condions then cc-by-sa data from europe which has database rights anyway might be just fine and a moot point. thanks for your answers and opinions, mike -- James Michael DuPont Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org Saving wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com Contributor FOSM, the CC-BY-SA map of the world http://fosm.org Mozilla Rep https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3 _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
