Jonathan Bennett wrote > It is not the NYT making that statement, but reporting the fact that > someone else made it. Whatever we think of its accuracy, Mapion's > spokesman did actually say that, so the NYT has made no factual error > that needs correcting. At best we could expect a right to reply, which I > believe the second article gave us.
Yes, I understand that. However, I don't think that the second article counts as a "right to reply", because the rebuttal is hidden at the bottom of a different article that is mainly about Google and Navitime, and the second article is not referenced from the first in a way that indicates that it contains a rebuttal of the contents of the first. I think that something along the lines of "OSM members refute this statement", inside the first article, would be a "right to reply". -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Bad-wrong-OSM-publicity-tp5727276p5728640.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
