Seems like another case of OSM cutting it's nose to spite it's face.
It's discouraging users from editing at all. As NE2 notes it could have been placed at the bottom & described as being the (old version). Richard claims undelete & revert is a "minority interest". It maybe used infrequently but the time it saves for each edit it's used in is huge. The solution should have been to add the missing features into P2 before removing the item. Probably too busy having a focus group meeting to discuss yet another colour scheme change.
Dave F. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
