On 2013-02-05 19:36, Bryce Cogswell wrote:
Indeed. I suppose if one joins a project on the assumption that there
is no direction and no goals, at least you'll never be disappointed
in
how it turns out.
that's not what i said at all, or what i was implying. and your point
is a straw man argument: build up a false premise (that i am against
goals or direction), then knock it down and show how bad my argument
was.
the point i'm getting at is why do i (or anyone else) need to rely on
some other group to set the direction or goals. it's not goals per se
that's a problem, it's who sets them. the way this is going, several
people have suggested a small group should set policy, goals, direction,
whatever, for the other 30,000 who map, with no mandate whatsoever.
--
robin
http://universitywithoutconditions.ac.nz - Auckland's Free University
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
