I'm starting to wonder if something could be adapted from the cycleway node style network tagging. On Feb 13, 2013 8:41 AM, "Joseph Reeves" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The thing with the UK is that you get places named after junctions - > Church Cross, or whatever. That may well be a locality, but it's not the > same as naming the junction. That seems to be the difference with these > Japan / Korea examples. > > Joseph > > > On 13 February 2013 14:37, Kevin Peat <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 13 Feb 2013 14:20, "Martin Koppenhoefer" <[email protected]> >> wrote >> >> > +1, place=locality is generally a generic placeholder, which >> > should/could be substituted by the time we dig deeper into toponyms >> > and develop more specific classes... >> >> Well a place is just a named geographical location and I believe this tag >> combination is in common usage for named junctions [it certainly is in my >> part of GB where almost every crossroads is named] which as usual with OSM >> trumps all those people trying to create their idealised tagging schemes. >> >> Be sure to let everyone know when you have developed your "classes" ;] >> >> Kevin >> > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
