Hi Pavithran, Looking at the images, I can see attribution in the bottom left corners. It's a little small, but it's there: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2013/2/14/1360836990090/Lagos-007.jpg
Presumably these were scaled to fit the Guardian site and were originally more readable. Cheers, Joseph On 15 February 2013 13:58, pavithran <pavithra...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi , > Anyone glancing at the image published by The Guardian data [1] could > say its a OpenStreet Map . But there was no mention of that . > I went forward and read the article in Floating sheep [2] which also > doesn't mention anything about the maps being based / are OpenStreet > Map . Ironic is the fact that the author has taken pain to give > citations/ references to Geographical Research papers but missed even > a lil bit of info on where the maps are from . > > Sad to say that its coming from a research institute which studies the > "web" on issues like privacy ,copyright etc . > > 1. > http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/gallery/2013/feb/14/africa-tweets-mapped > 2 . > http://www.floatingsheep.org/2013/02/the-urban-geographies-of-tweets-in.html > > PS : I do realise that it[2] isnt an institute blog/press . > > Regards, > Pavithran > > > -- > pavithran sakamuri > http://look-pavi.blogspot.com > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
