This seems silly and useless. The imagery is subject to change and the way will become obsolete. I don't see a point in mapping this, and I'm okay with deleting these ways. But I'd rather hear from someone with more experience before anything happens. On Mar 31, 2013 10:39 AM, "ingalls" <nicholas.inga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It doesn't look like this is an isolated example, there are over a hundred > of these > > http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/boundary=imagery#overview > > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:35 PM, ingalls <nicholas.inga...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hey guys came across a really weird way. >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/104974280 >> >> Not sure exactly what it is supposed to represent? Is it showing where >> bing has high quality imagery? And secondly can I remove it! >> > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
