Am 14.04.2013 20:37, schrieb Werner Hoch: > Am Sonntag, den 14.04.2013, 23:38 +1000 schrieb Steve Bennett: >> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Simon Poole <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Just a further data point. As of the end of last month we had edits from >>> 324'152 unique UIDs, not quite 30% of all accounts (some of the >>> changesets are likely to be empty, but the number is still quite a bit >>> larger than the often quoted 200'000). > I think the quotet 220000 are those mappers that still "own" an active > osm object. (last editor). Yes, the problem is that particularly the smallest editors are the ones that are most likely to get their complete last edit contribution zapped by a bot or by a regular edit.
>> Is there (or could there be?) a graph of contributions against number >> of u-el-? Might be interesting also to see whether the number of users >> on zero is vastly different to the number of users on one edit, two >> edits etc. > http://www.h-renrew.de/h/osm/osmchecks/03_Statistik/planet/statistic.html > > statistic based only on the last editors. > about 25000 Users only own a single node. See above this number is probably far to low. > > 90% of all ways and nodes are last edited by about 7000 users. > 99% by about 30000 users. > --> 9% of data, 23000 users > 99.9% 80000 Users > --> 0.9% of data, 50000 users > and the rest: > --> 0.1% of data, 140000 users > Don't forget that we lost another ~40k editors in total and about 15k ("last editors") in the planet dump due to the licence change. Simon _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
