It seems that the desire to use a huge image as the background comes at the expense of the page content. To me a copyright page is about getting the *details* over. By placing too much emphasis on the image the copyright page appears like a *brand* or some fancy press release. We have other pages that can be used for that. :-)
By the way, who gets to pick the images used on the copyright page? What if USA Today want to use a different image that better aligns with their brand? Regards, Rob p.s. Attribution mark is much better, though I share the concerns about using "by". p.p.s By *details* I mean the legal jargon, plus a message that says "hey you can get involved too". I don't think an image alone does this.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
