Hello Andreas,
to c)
I don't like to support different reference systems in WIWOSM. Each
country has it's own for monuments and than somebody starts with
vulcanos or brigdes.... We would have to update WIWOSM each week without
the generic system we have now.
Greetings Tim
Am 05.05.2013 11:26, schrieb Andreas Labres:
Tim,
There are different problems, let's keep them separate (vielleicht reden wir
auch - Englisch - aneinander vorbei... ;)
a) There is a problem in the code of osm.org how it links wikipedia articles.
You can't do a link like this:
$PATH#anchor?uselang=en
This is bad URL syntax. You (osm.org) have to do
$PATH?uselang=en#anchor
https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/4802
b) It is "not a good idea" to link objects in Wikipedia lists like
Liste der denkmalgeschützten Objekte in Wien/Penzing#objektid-25026
This object should have its own "name" in Wikipedia, which then redirects to
whereever this object can be found. This shouldn't be "external" but a feature
in Wikipedia/Wikidata/Wikiwhatsoever.
c) The objectID I'm referencing is nothing "external", it's a nationally unique
ID given by the Austrian Bundesdenkmalamt which identifies each "monument" in
Austria. Therefore it's the best idea to use /this/ as /the/ reference to the
given object (with reference to it being a historic monument). Alex Wagner, who
created all the "Denkmalgeschützte Objekte" in Austria in the Wikipedia used it
when he created the Wikipedia pages.
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-at/2013-April/005542.html ff
OSM could save this objectID, say:
ref:monument=AT:25026
and WIWOSM then knows how to find this (uniquely identified) object in
Wikipedia.
/al
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
