I tried sending this mail through nabble earlier on, but it doesn't seem to have gone through, so I'll try and resend. If you did get this email twice, I apologise.
----- Clifford Snow wrote >Your survey is mostly demographics. There were two actual questions >related >to mapping. I'm not sure what you hope to achieve. Understanding the demographics of the mapping community can be a very interesting question and topic of research. After all, there has just been set up a new mailing list "diversity-talk", to discuss the demographics of openstreetmap and how to achieve a broad appeal to many different demographic groups. Having some good hard numbers about the current situation, to augment the data we already have, would be rather helpful. If good methods can be worked out how to achieve those numbers, these studies can be repeated periodically. That can then be helpful, amongst other things, to see if various outreach programs to try and diversify the community have had success, and if yes in which demographics. Understanding the motivation of mappers can also be hugely interesting! This information can help figure out how best to promote OSM and get more people involved in mapping and where best to focus efforts to attract more people. >Clifford Snow wrote >Please rethink this survey and try again. Without knowing the questions this research is trying to answer and what other tools and data they are using as well as their analysis method, you cannot judge if it is a good survey and appropriately set up for the questions it hopes to address. Furthermore, good research in social sciences is often incredibly difficult. As you usually have no interventional control on the subject of study and you often have to deal with subjective reports in surveys. So it is often not uncommon to have to ask many seemingly redundant and strange questions in order to get around or detect biases. >Clifford Snow wrote >As Frederik Ramm suggest, please >explain more about your research. I would be very interested in hearing more about the research as well. However, there are situations when you don't want to reveal the actual questions you are interested in ahead of time to your survey participants as alone the knowledge of what the researcher is interested can bias the results. With the relatively factual questions of this survey that seems less likely though.. Overall, I think there is more than enough room for a lot of different research, both social and gis research in the OSM community and its data. Imho it is great to see research into these topics and the more the better! Kai _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk