Hi, out of curiosity - is it possible to give us a link to the google mashup (at that spot) for reference?
regards Peter Am 04.08.2013 01:51, schrieb Paul Johnson: > A few weeks ago, I converted "County Road XXXX" in (and in a few cases, > immediately around) Osage County, Oklahoma, since these roads don't have a > name, just a number, and as we all know, references are not names. Didn't > think much of it until, lo and behold, I look at a Google Maps mashup, and > see a literally route-for-route identical conversion on Google Maps, > including stray conversions in immediately adjacent counties. Google is > not attributing this data properly, and it's pretty glaring in both cases > considering that I've only done Osage County and immediately adjacent stray > routes like this so far, given that unlike most other counties in Oklahoma, > there's no complicating letters in the route numbers that need to be > handled. How do we handle this situation? Do we have a contact at Google > in cases of potential plagiarism? > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
