On 03/03/2014, Dave F. <dave...@madasafish.com> wrote: > On 28/02/2014 00:41, moltonel 3x Combo wrote: >> Once again : sharing nodes is fine, nobody should give out to you if >> you initially share nodes between a highway and a park. But it's just >> an approximation/simplification; not sharing nodes (and giving the >> park its actual shape) is better. And people are entitled to give out >> if you glue road to a park that was previously accurately mapped. > > Could you clarify what you mean by "give out"?
Complain to the contributor. Say "you're doing it wrong". Angrily and immediately correct the mistake. > To me, it appears in the first part of your comment you're saying once > it's been mapped as shared nodes it shouldn't be improved by separating > them. The disambiguating word is "initially". I explicitly say that separating nodes is an improvement. I'm trying to make it clear that "glued vs separate" is a "good vs better" issue, not a "wrong vs right" one. That type of node sharing is not an error like, say, self-intersecting ways is an error. That shouldn't stop you from advocating separate nodes; just don't do that self-righteously proclaiming that yours is the only way, as there are obviously contributors who prefer to share nodes, and it's their right to do so... Initially :p _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
