On 15.05.2014 15:41, JB wrote: > This is not done, and I certainly hope that the « community » does not > take it for granted before a hypothetical future vote. > And that if an actual vote takes place, a real debate also takes place, > with real counter-arguments replied to the already heard arguments. > JB.
What is the "this" in your reply? I'm not sure whether you are assuring me that no ODbL data will be imported into OSM or claiming that OSM will never change its license again. The relicensing clause is there for a reason: The community in 10 years will mostly consist of completely different persons than today. And *they* should be able to determine what OSM's license will be in 10 years. Limiting their choices in order to slightly speed up the completion of house number mapping today would be not be wise. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
