Context for this discussion can be seen here: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/2014-June/027910.html
2014-06-13 11:51 GMT-03:00 JB <[email protected]>: > (not sure this is really a good idea, leaving dev decide on their side… > This is how you sometimes end with something users won't want to use… > JB.) > > > Le 13/06/2014 16:26, Yves a écrit : > > Thing is, it may be easier to find a consensus in -dev than elsewhere. > So a fixing list would be a good thing, indeed. > Yves > > On 13 juin 2014 16:20:09 UTC+02:00, Holger Jeromin <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Paul Norman schrieb am 13.06.2014 01:25: >> >>> >>> To support this, I looked for some numbers. Using a shortened deleted tags >>> list, there are 1 million new-style and 261k old-style MPs. Of the >>> old-style, >>> 256k have a member with role outer. 251k of these have entirely consistent >>> tags on outers, while 2.3k have two sets of tags among the ways. About 180 >>> have three or more.[3] An old-style MP without entirely consistent tags on >>> outers is ambiguous and in error. >> >> >> To support this change it would be nice to setup a list on the web with >> the buggy relations. A few ten thousands broken Wikipedia tags were >> corrected with such a list. >> >> Perhaps the change could be enforced later, after a lot of MPs are >> corrected. >> >> > -- > Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté. > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing > [email protected]https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
