I always thought Notes could work in 2 directions. It's sometimes easier to create a Note from OsmAND or Vespucci, than to do the mapping right there and then. Those are the Notes I usually resolve myself, after I come home, as it's easier to work on the data with JOSM.
They can, of course serve as to do items too, but even then, I would probably reply to the Notes with what can be seen in the field and still only process them after getting back home. Polyglot 2014-07-29 22:32 GMT+02:00 Jóhannes Birgir Jensson <[email protected]>: > The previous discussion about apparent automated Notes spam in various > places about speed limits brought one comment I found interesting, where JB > said "but in France, I have never ever seen anyone comment on someone > else's note". > > Well I was surveying some area in France earlier this year and found a > spot with missing street names so I marked it in and a JBacc1 (same JB?) > commented "so what" (in French Oui. Quels sont-ils ?) and resolved it > thus. > > I reopened it with a comment of my own, I found this approach very strange > because Map Notes are in my mind a to-do list obvious problems that require > surveying on the ground. > > The note in question is this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/182123 > > Do we need a a note etiquette? I watch over Notes created and closed in > Iceland and delete obvious spam (two notes yesterday with dfasfasdfafsd) > but keep them open if they are genuine. > > --Jói > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
