Am 18.12.2014 um 11:09 schrieb JB:> Le 18/12/2014 00:02, Clifford Snow a écrit : >> According to the wiki [1] they may be properly attributing OSM. >> Paragraph 3. They provided a link and they are treating us with the >> same prominence as other map suppliers. >> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ > So the fight began anyway. Sensitive subject. > Sorry, but I read there (same page, paragraph 3a, seems you stopped > reading too early) : > /For a //*browsable electronic map*//(e.g. embedded in a web page or > mobile phone application), the credit should appear in the corner of the > map, as commonly seen with map APIs/libraries such as Google Maps. // > /So, no, it /should /be on the map.
+1 So far we are talking about the map data, but they use tiles from all kinds of OSM-Services. Thought these tiles are under some licences, too, but do not find any mentioned. Not on the online map nor on the about page. cu colliar
0xE8F56581.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
