> The bicycle router seems to give same result as car router in my area?
Also for me, bicycle routers seem unable to avoid major roads. Terrible compared to http://brouter.de/brouter-web/. PS: Please, send unformatted test to mailing list. 2015-02-17 4:00 GMT+01:00 Jóhannes Birgir Jensson <j...@betra.is>: > Adding surface tags sounds more like an upgrade than an outbreak. > Tagging for the router surely means that you are tagging roads based on > their finer properties, single-lane or dual-lane, asphalt or gravel etc. > > Also if the road is less traveled it sounds like a no-brainer to tag it as > unclassified instead of tertiary? > > The bicycle router seems to give same result as car router in my area? > > > Þann 17.2.2015 00:14, skrifaði Jo Walsh: > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015, at 08:19 PM, Colin Smale wrote: > > +1 to that! Hope it doesn't lead to an outbreak of "tagging for the > router" though... You know, down/upgrading roads to "improve" the results... > > Anecdatally, I would say that outbreak is well in hand already :/ > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing > listtalk@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
