On 25/02/2015, Bryce Nesbitt <[email protected]> wrote: > fixme=yes is an interesting one socially. It's a bit like > tiger:reviewed=no
Yes. I'm also willing to bet that in manny cases fixme=yes was added by mistake, without the mapper understanding what it "means". > If there's an obvious problem, I might feel confident to fix the issue and > clear the tag out. Sure. > But for most nodes I might be unsure what's wrong, or > not be confident I know 100% about the object. Thus the fixme=yes sits > there forever, for future generations of mappers to look at, make the same > conclusion, and leave the tag for the next next generation of mapper. IMHO if you're an experienced mapper in this area and you couldn't make head or tails of a fixme, nobody will. So shamelessly remove the distracting tag. It's no worse than the "aging" process you suggest in another mail. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
