On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Paul Norman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 3/3/2015 9:47 AM, Richard Weait wrote: > >> Are notes more-likely to be resolved when a dialogue is possible >> (non-anonymous)? >> > > Another possible reason is that non-anonymous notes tend to be from more > experienced users who leave easier to interpret notes. In that case, > there's not much to be done aside from normal measures to guide people to > mapping and try to make people return visitors. The solution to > inexperience is practice. Similarly a note where the user *left* contact info may be a note they are *more* engaged in. This could be resolved with A-B testing. Offer 50% of the anonymous traffic a heavier notes form and see what it does to engagement, quality and closability. I'd be more likely to leave a note on a more complete/credible form, but that's just me. I think a comment back from a mapper saying 'we fixed that' is a *huge incentive *to return to OSM again to see what took place. (See discussion: https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/776 )
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
