On 04/03/2015 19:20, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Andy,

It appears from an audit that there's been a modest amount of editing,and mechanical copying of the trees affected by the original import. In the UK that import was reverted, but worldwide it is messier. The denotation=cluster tag itself is problematic at best, and better methods of finding tree clusters have been demonstrated. Thus it really seems that the most pragmatic choice is a wholesale purge of the cluster value, and a selective (no touching manual mapping) purge of the fixme.


I can certainly see arguments for that (I was around at the time the tag was introduced and never exactly understood what "denotation=cluster" was supposed to be for), but suspect that a consultation with some of the other mappers using it since would make sense.

If you're getting rid of _all_ "denotation=cluster" worldwide then the wiki page that currently says "This was a mechanical edit based on proximity to other trees." needs changing.

Limiting the purge to the nodes last touched by user Nop would, unfortunately, be half baked. The cluster value was created by Nop out of a disagreement with the concept of mapping individual trees. The problem spread from there.

Well if the aim was to just undo the original mechanical edits that would of course still be an option - not by looking at " node last touched by" but by looking at the node lists from the original mechanical edit changesets.

Cheers,

Andy


_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to