1) For me there is no a-priori conflict: according to the tagging, this is a pedestrian street, where you cannot ride your bicycle, except on a cycle lane which is somewhere on this pedestrian street. Why should a pedestrian street not have a bicycle lane like any other street. Or am I missing something?
2) have you talked to the user mritz who put the bicycle=no tag there? He may know the local situation. Volker Padova, Italy > > > Message: 8 > Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 10:03:42 +0200 > From: Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl> > To: talk@openstreetmap.org > Subject: [OSM-talk] bicycle=no and cycleway=lane conflicting? > Message-ID: <9be720d7ddc344ffa3a382b224a4d...@xs4all.nl> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > > I came across this example [1] where a way has bicycle=no and > cycleway=lane. I was using brouter [2] for some bicyclerouting and one > of the rules for bikerouting there is that bicycle=no means no bicycles > are allowed. > IMHO these two tags are also conflicting and the bicycle=no should be > removed. Any thoughts? > > [1] <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12823327> > [2] <http://brouter.de/brouter-web/> > > Maarten > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 11:51:34 +0200 > From: Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@gmail.com> > To: talk@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] bicycle=no and cycleway=lane conflicting? > Message-ID: <20150409115134.7b67a6d2@Grisznak> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > [bicycle=no; cycleway=lane] means that there is a lane for bicycles but > cycling is anyway not allowed there. > > Typically it would be a tagging mistake, usable cycleway lanes should > be tagged as [cycleway=lane]. > > On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 10:03:42 +0200 > Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > > I came across this example [1] where a way has bicycle=no and > > cycleway=lane. I was using brouter [2] for some bicyclerouting and > > one of the rules for bikerouting there is that bicycle=no means no > > bicycles are allowed. > > IMHO these two tags are also conflicting and the bicycle=no should be > > removed. Any thoughts? > > > > [1] <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12823327> > > [2] <http://brouter.de/brouter-web/> > > > > Maarten > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > talk mailing list > > talk@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > ------------------------------ > > End of talk Digest, Vol 128, Issue 6 > ************************************ >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk