Agreed with all the above. No sense coming across very small in a disaster, but it is an opportunity to tell our "story". Whether the BBC bites or not is really out of our control.
— Sent from Mailbox On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Pierre Béland <[email protected]> wrote: > Harry could you assure that they interview KLL ? I agree with Simon. This > would be the more beneficial for OSM. > regard > Pierre > De : Simon Poole <[email protected]> > À : [email protected] > Envoyé le : Vendredi 1 mai 2015 18h14 > Objet : Re: [OSM-talk] BBC License Violation? > > Correct link worked now. > I'm not aware that anybody in the LWG has a BBC contact, but Harry Wood > from the CWG (and HOT) should have one. > It is one of the cases were more benefit is likely to be had by getting > the BBC to do a piece on OpenStreetMap, KLL and the volunteers that are > supporting the aid efforts by remote mapping. Getting attribution in an > article that will be somewhere in the archives tomorrow doesn't really > help anybody, and will potentially just end in disagreement because the > provience of the data is likely difficult to actually trace, better > strategy to have BBC owe us one. > Simon > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
