> On 3 Jun 2015, at 07:00, Maarten Deen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 2015-06-03 02:04, pmailkeey . wrote:
>> iD shows oneway=unknown if it's not set. If it's unknown, iD should
>> not show oneway at all.
> 
> I agree.
> 
>> In OSM if oneway=no then it's not oneway and the oneway tag should not
>> appear at all.
> 
> Here I don't agree.
> 
>> The only time oneway should appear is in the case of oneway=yes - and
>> the '=yes' is superfluous.
> 
> Some roads are implied oneway. E.g. junction=roundabout and highway=motorway 
> both imply that the road is one-way only. If for some reason the object in 
> case is not oneway, a oneway=no tag is very much needed.
> 
> I agree that in every case where oneway=yes is not implied, oneway=no is 
> superfluous (in a network design way), but that does not make oneway=no 
> superfluous.
> 

There are some cases where oneway=no is useful. For example an area where there 
is lots of one way streets and only a few that are two way, adding the 
oneway=no confirms that the data is correct rather than the oneway=yes being 
missing. Similarly where a street was oneway previously and has recently been 
made two way, this makes it explicit that it is now two way in addition to 
whatever changeset note there may be.

Shaun


_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to