On 5 June 2015 at 12:36, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Am 05.06.2015 um 11:33 schrieb David Fisher <djfishe...@gmail.com>: > > > > As for "landuse=residential" -- I agree that we could probably do > > without it. But it does add to the readability of the map, especially > > at low zoom levels, as it enables you to see at a glance where places > > are and how big they are. > > > residential landuse is often seen as "default", it is often used to mark > the built up area rather than just the residential areas (especially in > villages). We should encourage place polygons for this and restrict the use > of residential landuse to residential areas. > > It would help a LOT if they were rendered on the standard map ! WHY do we have this agony of stuff not being rendered ? Here's a map of the world. We've not marked on any places as we feel it would be too confusing. What's the flipping point. Flog the renderers I say. -- Mike. @millomweb <https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction> - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to the country's ongoing harassment of me, my family, property & pets* T&Cs <https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail>
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
