This has been fixed in Osmand early this year after being reported more than 2 years ago. Unfortunately, multiple via ways are still not supported. https://code.google.com/p/osmand/issues/detail?id=1729
On 6/17/15, Janko Mihelić <[email protected]> wrote: > If you ask me, they are all in their infancy. Non of these routing services > even route right. In a turn restriction the "via" role can be a way. > Neither OSRM, ORS or GraphHopper knows how to restrict that, and that's > IMHO one of the crucial parts of a routing engine. > > When one of them starts routing right, than we can talk about picking a > winner service. Right now only MapQuest knows how to route. > > Janko > > sri, 17. lip 2015. 05:34 Hans De Kryger <[email protected]> je > napisao: > >> Why do OSRM & OpenRoutingService compete against each other instead of >> joining resources and combining efforts to make the best routing service >> out there? Am i missing something? I know it's nice to have different >> services for different uses but this doesn't seem like a good use of >> resources at all. I may be the only one with this opinion, but this has >> bug >> me for awhile. >> >> *Regards,* >> >> *Hans* >> >> >> *http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13 >> <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13>* >> >> *Sorry for any misspellings* >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
