Saturday 15 August 2015 12:59:55, Paul Norman: > On 8/15/2015 4:26 AM, Dave F. wrote: > > Hi > > > > Does the combined wood/forest update include landcover=trees? If not > > it needs to be included all three should render the same (IMO). > > No. Nor are there any issues created about rendering landcover=trees. As > the landcover key is currently not in the database, it is not happening > in the short-term either.
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/landcover 17 117 occurences is not 'not in the database'. Sure, it's only 0.12% of all landuses, but this is a key that isn't even rendered on the default style. > For clarity, this is not to imply that we will or will not render > landcover=trees. As there's no issue about it, it hasn't been discussed. -- The field "from" of an email is about as reliable as the address written on the back of an envelope. Use OpenPGP to verify that this message is sent by me. You can find my public key in the public directories, like pool.sks-keyservers.net.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
