On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 08:38:08PM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > On 09/03/2015 02:25 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > also there are good arguments why it shouldn't be secret who owns which > > pieces of land > > "shouldn't be secret" != "should be in OSM"
what should be in OSM where possible is pubilc/private land. This is in many countries relevant for path/track routing. Parcel boundaries probably should be included at least for commercial use lands - it is good to know that a piece of land belongs to a company spraying poison on their fields or to a mining company and may fly around your ears anytime. Richard _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
