2015-10-14 14:40 GMT+02:00 Christoph Hormann <[email protected]>: > The general convention in OSM, also for boundaries, is to map the actual > situation on the ground, that is which areas are actually administred > by which authority. >
this often doesn't help though, because in remote areas there is nothing to "administer". Some time ago the case of the Mont Blanc came up on a local mailing list, more precisely in which language the name should be tagged (the decision was to put both names into the name tag: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/281399025/history although France is claiming to "administer" the peak alone). Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
